About Government macroeconomic intervention in A Level Economics
Government macroeconomic intervention is one of the 11 main topics in our A Level Economics (Cambridge (CAIE) 9708) question bank, and about 7% of its real questions come from it. Tayyari Karo has 64 real questions on this topic from 2021 to 2026, from Paper 1, Paper 2, Paper 3, Paper 4; 46 are multiple choice and marked instantly, and the rest are structured questions with a model answer. By difficulty: 31 medium, 26 hard, 7 easy.
Work through the questions below, then open the explanation for each one. Redo the ones you missed a few days later.
Try 8 real questions
These are real past-paper questions. Think of your answer first, then open the explanation.
May/June 2026 · Paper 1 · Government macroeconomic intervention
Some countries experienced a recent decline in investment spending. What might be done to stop such a decline?
- increase quotas on imports
- lower interest rates
- raise income tax
- set up training courses
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. lower interest rates
Lower interest rates reduce the cost of borrowing and raise the return on investment.
May/June 2025 · Paper 1 · Government macroeconomic intervention
A government uses expansionary monetary policy over a three-year period. Which combination identifies the likely impact of such a policy?
- real GDP falling; price level rising; unemployment falling
- real GDP rising; price level rising; unemployment rising
- real GDP rising; price level rising; unemployment falling
- real GDP rising; price level falling; unemployment rising
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. real GDP rising; price level rising; unemployment falling
Expansionary monetary policy (e.g. lower interest rates) raises aggregate demand, increasing real GDP, reducing unemployment, but also putting upward pressure on the price level.
October/November 2025 · Paper 1 · Government macroeconomic intervention
The government of a country reduces its budget deficit by cutting government spending. At the same time, the central bank raises interest rates. When might this combination of policies be used? (unemployment rate / inflation rate)
- high / high
- low / high
- high / low
- low / low
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. low / high
Cutting government spending and raising interest rates are both contractionary/deflationary policies, used to reduce aggregate demand when inflation is high, even though unemployment is low (an overheating economy).
October/November 2024 · Paper 1 · Government macroeconomic intervention
Which combination of fiscal and monetary policies would certainly be expansionary?
| | government spending | taxes | money supply |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | decrease | decrease | decrease |
| B | decrease | increase | decrease |
| C | increase | decrease | increase |
| D | increase | increase | increase |
- Combination A
- Combination B
- Combination C
- Combination D
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Combination C
Rising government spending, falling taxes and a rising money supply all work in the same, expansionary direction, unambiguously raising aggregate demand; the other combinations mix expansionary and contractionary elements.
October/November 2023 · Paper 3 · Government macroeconomic intervention
Which government policy to counter the effects of income inequality is correctly matched with one of its advantages and one of its disadvantages? (policy / advantage / disadvantage)
- food subsidies for the poor / targets those in need / high administrative costs
- higher national minimum wage / encourages skill training / higher budget deficit
- provision of free child care / increases employability / disincentive to work
- universal monetary benefits / saves on bureaucracy / reduced labour mobility
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. food subsidies for the poor / targets those in need / high administrative costs
Food subsidies can be targeted specifically at low-income households in need, but administering means-tested or targeted schemes (verifying eligibility, distribution) tends to be costly. The other combinations pair a policy with an advantage or disadvantage that does not correctly/logically match (e.g. a minimum wage doesn't inherently raise the budget deficit; free child care would not typically create a work disincentive; universal benefits paid to everyone do save on means-testing bureaucracy, but they would not be expected to reduce labour mobility).
October/November 2022 · Paper 1 · Government macroeconomic intervention
A government announces its intention to reduce the level of transfer payments in the economy. Which statement made by the government is consistent with this intention?
- There need to be more incentives for unemployed workers to seek jobs.
- State pensions need to be increased.
- The level of income tax needs to be raised.
- The level of government expenditure needs to be increased.
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. There need to be more incentives for unemployed workers to seek jobs.
Transfer payments (e.g. unemployment benefits) are payments made without a corresponding contribution to output. Encouraging unemployed workers into jobs, rather than remaining on benefits, is consistent with wanting to reduce transfer payments.
May/June 2026 · Paper 2 · Government macroeconomic intervention
Japan inflation case study (see Question 1). (b) Apart from interest rates, state two other tools of monetary policy that could be used in Japan to control inflation. [2]
Show model answer
Any two for 1 mark each: money supply; credit regulations; quantitative tightening (accepted); exchange rates.
Monetary policy tools other than interest rates include controlling the money supply, credit regulations and exchange rate policy.
October/November 2024 · Paper 2 · Government macroeconomic intervention
Assess the potential benefits and limitations of using monetary policy to control inflation in a country such as Argentina. [6]
Show model answer
Up to 4 marks for explanation/analysis: potential benefits — raising interest rates can reduce aggregate demand and thereby reduce inflation (up to 3 marks); potential limitations — the difficulty of knowing what the appropriate interest rate should be, and the possibility that demand could be relatively interest-inelastic, limiting the policy's effectiveness (up to 3 marks). Up to 2 marks for evaluation: a relevant evaluation weighing up the benefits and limitations of monetary policy in this context (1 mark), and a conclusion on the likely overall effect (1 mark).
Marking split: max 4 marks explanation/analysis + max 2 marks evaluation = 6 marks.